Affiliate disclosure. MentorsReview may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page.
APPSUMO DEAL · PRICES CHECKED NOVEMBER 9, 2026
Start with one code if your pilot fits 25,000 monthly requests
Scamalytics gives software teams an IP risk score and network signals they can add to an existing review workflow. AppSumo listed one code at $79 one time for 25,000 requests per month. If you only need occasional checks or have yet to define a workflow, compare the vendor’s free plan before buying. The deal terms exclude prior accounts and trials, so decide which route you want before opening an account.
Check the Scamalytics deal on AppSumoWhat Scamalytics gives you
Scamalytics is an IP intelligence service. An application sends an IP address to the API and gets a score from 0 to 100, a risk label and supporting network information. The service documents signals for VPNs, proxies, Tor, data centers and geolocation. The score and the supporting fields help explain why a signup or transaction might merit extra review. The API returns the data, and your application or operations team decides how to use it.
There are two ways to work with it. The API suits teams that want a lookup during a signup, login or checkout event. The bulk portal suits someone reviewing a list of addresses from a past incident, such as a cluster of suspicious registrations. Bulk lookup avoids building a live integration for that investigation. The listing says bulk and API lookups share the same allowance, so the report an analyst runs can reduce the headroom available to production.
The AppSumo offer covers Essential plan updates. The API documentation separates Essential fields from additional Premium data. If your workflow depends on a particular commercial proxy feed, an organisation field or a particular level of geolocation detail, confirm it appears in the actual Essential response before choosing a code bundle. Read the API documentation.
How we evaluated the deal. This review compares the listing and official documentation and uses illustrative scenarios. It does not report measured fraud reduction, request latency or an independent accuracy benchmark.
Scamalytics AppSumo pricing and request limits
The AppSumo listing showed the following one-time USD prices on November 9, 2026. Prices and availability can change. For the first four code counts, the monthly limits appeared in AppSumo’s comparison table. Scamalytics’ founder also confirmed a six-code ceiling with one million monthly API calls. Confirm the allowance in the current plan selector before buying, especially if you are considering five codes.
| Codes | Listed price | Monthly requests |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $79 | 25,000 |
| 2 | $158 | 50,000 |
| 3 | $237 | 100,000 |
| 4 | $316 | 250,000 |
| 5 | $395 | Check in plan selector |
| 6 | $474 | 1,000,000, per founder Q&A |
AppSumo lists lifetime access, a 60-day refund period and a separate requirement to redeem within 60 days. The listing limits the deal to brand-new Scamalytics users, including people without an earlier trial, and says upgrades are available while the deal is live. Read the terms before starting a vendor trial or assuming you can upgrade later. See AppSumo’s plan and eligibility terms.
The vendor lists 5,000 monthly requests on its direct free tier and $25 per month for 25,000 requests on its published pricing page. At that monthly rate, four months cost $100, compared with $79 for the one-code listing. That comparison uses the stated volumes and prices. It leaves out taxes, optional Premium feeds and any differences in the terms of each offer. If you only expect to need the higher volume for a short project, compare the actual period you expect to pay for. See Scamalytics’ direct pricing.
Compare the live AppSumo code prices
Estimate monthly IP lookups before buying a code
Start by counting the events you will score, such as completed registrations, password resets that need extra review or checkouts flagged by your existing system. If the same visitor can generate several events, estimate the calls separately. Then add the volume for one-off reports and rechecks. Comparing the deal with your total page views makes sense only if you actually intend to score every page view.
Example for a small SaaS team. Suppose you expect 9,000 signup lookups, 4,000 sensitive account-event lookups and 2,000 bulk records in a normal month. That is 15,000 lookups. Adding a 30% planning buffer gets you to 19,500, which fits the listed one-code allowance. If a launch doubles all three workloads, the same workflow would need 30,000 before any buffer. That difference is a reason to estimate launch volume separately from a quiet month.
Example for a store. A store with 40,000 monthly orders may already have a payment processor that sends most orders through without intervention. If the store wants IP intelligence only for the 5,000 orders it reviews and another 3,000 account events, the starting budget is 8,000 calls before retries or bulk investigations. Ask the person running the process how often they also export records for review. A monthly report can be the biggest job in an otherwise modest integration.
Pick the cheapest code count that covers the busiest month you can reasonably predict. If you have no event totals yet, measure a representative week and adjust for busy periods and queued reports. Work out what the team will do near the limit and which lookups matter most if capacity gets tight. A written priority order gives the team a usable plan even if a promotion, launch or incident changes the numbers.
A pilot for signups, orders or past incidents
Start with one decision point
Choose a specific place where someone already makes a decision. A membership service might review repeated new account registrations. An ecommerce team might review unusual orders that the payment processor has already surfaced. Define who makes the decision today and what a lookup could add. A pilot with a named owner and a clear task is easier to assess than a score attached to every visit.
Observe first and compare against outcomes
Collect scores alongside the result of the existing review. Look at known legitimate cases as well as confirmed abuse. The interesting cases are the ones where the new signal and the existing decision disagree. A legitimate user may be on a corporate VPN or privacy relay, and a suspicious order can arrive from an ordinary connection. Ask what other evidence the reviewer had and whether the additional field would have changed the outcome.
For a small team, a simple review sheet can track the event, broad risk band, existing decision, later outcome and any friction the customer experienced. Use the information your team needs and keep access limited to the people who review these events. If you cannot reliably label outcomes, keep the pilot focused on how useful the extra context is to a reviewer before turning it into an automatic rule.
Decide how the flow should behave without a result
Agree in advance how your signup or checkout should handle a slow or unavailable lookup. For example, leave routine signups in the existing flow and send already unusual orders to the normal review queue. Keep credentials server-side and review the API fields and account settings in a test environment. Document who can change a rule and how to switch it off if it creates unexpected customer friction.
Set a date to review the pilot
At the end of the test, compare the number of cases the signal helped, the number of legitimate cases it would have delayed, the total lookup usage and the time reviewers spent. Break the results out by the event being evaluated. A score that helps with waves of fake registrations may contribute little to a store’s order review. Use that distinction to decide where to keep the lookup and where to remove it.
Who should buy the deal?
Buy one code if you have an owner for a recurring workflow, your estimated demand fits within 25,000 requests with room for spikes and you qualify under AppSumo’s new-user terms. This is the clearest fit for a developer adding network context to a SaaS signup flow or an analyst who regularly needs to enrich a modest batch of IPs.
Consider more codes if you can already measure why the smaller cap will be too low. Count bulk jobs across clients and environments and verify how a subscription may be used before assuming one license covers an agency’s entire workload. A larger plan makes more sense once your event logs or a pilot support it and you have verified the exact allowance in the selector.
Start with direct pricing or postpone if you only run occasional checks, want a particular Premium field or lack anyone to manage an integration. The vendor has a public lookup for individual examples, and its direct pricing page describes a free option. For domain registration, DNS or website checks, see our DomScan review for a separate type of workflow.
How to handle a bulk review without spending your production allowance
Before you upload a full export, decide what you are trying to learn. An analyst investigating a wave of questionable registrations might start with the addresses attached to accounts already marked for review. Then they could add a sample of ordinary signups from the same period so the comparison includes routine traffic. If many events share the same IP address, decide whether you need a lookup for each row or only one for each unique address in that particular report.
Keep a mapping between the results and your internal event records so you can investigate a match without mixing up different customers on the same network. Review both the score and the surrounding information, such as the period of the signup spike or the number of attempts per account. A cluster of similar IP results can help you decide what to investigate next. The transaction history or account evidence still matters when deciding what happened.
When you run a bulk job on a shared allowance, compare the number of rows you plan to send with the remaining monthly capacity. Leave enough room for live activity, especially near a launch or sales event. Record how long the job took, which columns the team actually used and what the report changed in the review process. A smaller repeatable report is often easier to budget and maintain than a large export you rarely act on.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scamalytics block visitors automatically?
The API returns data for the calling application. Your own integration determines whether that leads to an alert, additional verification, a manual review or a block.
Does one code include unlimited lookups?
AppSumo lists 25,000 monthly requests for one code. Bulk jobs share the allowance with API requests, so include both when sizing the plan.
Can I use Scamalytics without building an API integration?
The AppSumo listing includes a bulk portal. It can work for periodic batch review when you can supply a list of IP addresses and have a place to review the output.
Can existing users buy this AppSumo offer?
The listing restricts eligibility to new Scamalytics users, with previous accounts, trials and paid plans excluded. Check the current terms before checkout if your team has used the vendor before.
Bottom line. Start with one code if your measured or conservatively estimated workflow fits the cap. Pick your plan based on the work you will actually do in a month, and confirm the current price and terms before paying.
